> So I went from 120 to 512. Does that mean 4.266 times more data was being read > off the drive?
Yes, but only when the OS decided you were doing sequential enough reads to gamble doing so. > Now that I use rrdtool 1.2.99999[...] the read value dropped even further: > 84KB/s, which is consistent with the announcement by the author (10x more > updates per second). I haven't gone to this yet (I'm no longer responsible for the ~250 ide disks running rrd..) but it it sure does sound promising. _______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
