Hello Tobias, I am trying to make a smokeping in portugues and i have still problems with the accents(úéáõã) and also with Spaces in the names of files in the config file. Everytime i got a message like "cant find the table defintion" or something like that. I found only one short example how to display the html but even this don`t work because in the example was used a .htaccess file which i donŽt have. I think that is the same problem like with umlaute in german, so that you still have a solution and i only was not able to find it. Perhaps you can give me a small hint. kind regards Martin > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Gesendet: 29.09.08 06:11:11 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: rrd-users Digest, Vol 21, Issue 15
> Send rrd-users mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of rrd-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Problems graphing (Joshua Keroes) > 2. Re: Problems graphing (Laura McCord) > 3. How to parse a log into a rrd graph? (digdug) > 4. Re: Bug in rrdtool xport? (Tobias Oetiker) > 5. Re: How to parse a log into a rrd graph? (Andy Riebs) > 6. Re: RRDtool 1.3.2 released (MAJOR BUGFIX!) (Tobias Oetiker) > 7. MRTG-RRD anomaly!! (Firdous Saleheen) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:36:12 -0700 > From: "Joshua Keroes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [rrd-users] Problems graphing > To: "Laura McCord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Joshua Keroes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > # Start on Sep 1st > >> my $start_t = "1220227200"; > > > > > > # This is really Aug 31 > > > > > Hmm... > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ perl -le 'print scalar localtime(1220227200)' > Sun Aug 31 17:00:00 2008 > > It occurs to me that this is probably right once we account for timezones. > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/rrd-users/attachments/20080926/80f7791e/attachment-0001.html > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:34:02 -0500 > From: Laura McCord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [rrd-users] Problems graphing > To: Joshua Keroes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > I think you are right. > > It is Aug 31st instead of Sept. 1st. I think I needed 1220245200 for > Sept 1st. I looked it up using a date/epoch converter. * > > *-Laura > > Joshua Keroes wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Joshua Keroes <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > # Start on Sep 1st > > my $start_t = "1220227200"; > > > > > > # This is really Aug 31 > > > > > > Hmm... > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ perl -le 'print scalar localtime(1220227200)' > > Sun Aug 31 17:00:00 2008 > > > > It occurs to me that this is probably right once we account for timezones. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 23:30:03 -0700 (PDT) > From: digdug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [rrd-users] How to parse a log into a rrd graph? > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > Hello, > > i have some logfiles, filled with accounting messages from my DSL router and > want RRD to build a nice graph of the inbound and outbound traffic. > The messages occures asynchronously, about every few seconds. They contain > infos about how many bytes have bin received and send over the wire to that > time. So the cumulated value over a given time period gives the ammount of > data send/received in total. > > Now, i have written a parse for that logs getting: > TIMESTAMP, BYTES-SEND, BYTES-RECEIVED > > Well, i feed that into an RRD but the resulting graph was frustrating. > Instead of a nice shape i get only spikes in the graph, really ugly and > unuseable. What do i do wrong? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://n2.nabble.com/How-to-parse-a-log-into-a-rrd-graph--tp1120160p1120160.html > Sent from the RRDtool Users Mailinglist mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:49:07 +0200 (CEST) > From: Tobias Oetiker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [rrd-users] Bug in rrdtool xport? > To: Peter Valdemar M?rch (Lists) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi Peter, > > indeed rrdxport was/is totally broken for exports where the > different datasources do not use the same step size ... > > http://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool-trac/changeset/1529 > > fixes this for 1.2.x, 1.3.x and trunk. > > thanks for the test example, and also for reminding me that your > report did go unannswered. > > Interesting that such broken code could survive for so long, I > guess not to many people use xport ... > > cheers > tobi > > > > Today Tobias Oetiker wrote: > > > Peter, > > > > indeed, there seems something odd going, I guess I have to finally > > take a look at that xport code :-( > > > > cheers > > tobi > > Yesterday "Peter Valdemar M?rch (Lists)" wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > On Sept 9 I posted what I think is a bug here, and have gotten no > > > responses so far. Was there something wrong with my report? > > > > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.rrdtool.user/14609 > > > > > > I provided a simple test case where "rrdtool xport" cannot correctly > > > export data from two different rrd files that have different step > > > values. "rrdtool graph" works fine with the same rrd files and shows > > > correct data. More and newer observations on the same issue below. > > > > > > Hoping for a response, > > > > > > Peter > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > In the meantime, I've discovered that I don't even have to have a CDEF > > > composed of DS'es from two different rrd files for the output to be > > > wrong. Just using the DEF terms for ns3 and ns4 in the rrd xport line > > > below also produces incorrect output: > > > rrdtool xport --start 1220625000 --end 1220629800 \ > > > DEF:ns3=snmp2-0.rrd:ns3:AVERAGE XPORT:ns3:ns3 \ > > > DEF:ns4=snmp3-0.rrd:ns4:AVERAGE XPORT:ns4:ns4 > > > > > > ns4's value in the output varies every 5 minute row, but snmp3-0.rrd > > > containing ns4 has a step of 900 ( == 15 min ), so that is clearly > > > wrong, isn't it? Here are the first rows, with <row></row> taken out so > > > it doesn't wrap in the mail: > > > > > > <t>1220625300</t><v>6.1567155556e+02</v><v>2.6935130000e+03</v> > > > <t>1220625600</t><v>6.1546555556e+02</v><v>2.6935130000e+03</v> > > > <t>1220625900</t><v>6.7551154122e+02</v><v>NaN</v> > > > <t>1220626200</t><v>3.9705685194e+02</v><v>1.2931680988e+03</v> > > > <t>1220626500</t><v>3.2386227350e+02</v><v>3.6926825679e+02</v> > > > <t>1220626800</t><v>2.0573415556e+02</v><v>NaN</v> > > > <t>1220627100</t><v>1.0843768889e+02</v><v>0.0000000000e+00</v> > > > > > > Take out the DEF and XPORT terms for ns3, and ns4 is shown with exactly > > > the same values, but now 15 minutes apart. Seems rrdtool xport is taking > > > one value pr. <row> regardless of step, which is wrong: > > > > > > <t>1220625900</t><v>2.6935130000e+03</v> > > > <t>1220626800</t><v>2.6935130000e+03</v> > > > <t>1220627700</t><v>NaN</v> > > > <t>1220628600</t><v>1.2931680988e+03</v> > > > <t>1220629500</t><v>3.6926825679e+02</v> > > > <t>1220630400</t><v>NaN</v> > > > > > > Also, if I leave in the DEF for ns3, but remove the XPORT, I get the > > > incorrect output. So: > > > > > > Correct output: > > > rrdtool xport --start 1220625000 --end 1220629800 \ > > > DEF:ns4=snmp3-0.rrd:ns4:AVERAGE \ > > > XPORT:ns4:ns4 > > > > > > Incorrect output: > > > rrdtool xport --start 1220625000 --end 1220629800 \ > > > DEF:ns3=snmp2-0.rrd:ns3:AVERAGE \ > > > DEF:ns4=snmp3-0.rrd:ns4:AVERAGE \ > > > XPORT:ns4:ns4 > > > > > > Also strange, is that these two give different output: > > > > > > rrdtool xport --start 1220625000 --end 1220629800 \ > > > DEF:ns3=snmp2-0.rrd:ns3:AVERAGE \ > > > DEF:ns4=snmp3-0.rrd:ns4:AVERAGE \ > > > XPORT:ns3:ns3 \ > > > XPORT:ns4:ns4 > > > > > > rrdtool xport --start 1220625000 --end 1220629800 \ > > > DEF:ns4=snmp3-0.rrd:ns4:AVERAGE \ > > > DEF:ns3=snmp2-0.rrd:ns3:AVERAGE \ > > > XPORT:ns3:ns3 \ > > > XPORT:ns4:ns4 > > > > > > (I swapped the sequence of the DEFs) > > > > > > Looks like the step is calculated from the first DEF, whatever that > > > happens to be, and each row uses one value, regardless of step. "rrdtool > > > graph" seems smarter than that. > > > > > > Hope someone else can see that this is wrong too! > > > > > > Peter > > > > > > Peter Valdemar M?rch (Lists) 4ux6as402-at-sneakemail.com |Lists| wrote: > > > > I'm have two rrd files with different steps. I try to "see" three > > > > values: a DEF from each of these files, and a CDEF which is an average > > > > of each of them. It seems rrdtool graph does it "right", but rrdtool > > > > xport does it "wrong". Do you agree? > > > > > > > > In my reproducing script > > > > http://www.morch.com/misc/rrdxport_bug/REPRODUCE.sh.txt > > > > there are similar lines for graph and xport. Here graph: > > > > > > > > rrdtool graph --start 1220625000 --end 1220629800 ok.png \ > > > > DEF:ns3=snmp2-0.rrd:ns3:AVERAGE 'LINE1:ns3#0000ff:ns3' \ > > > > DEF:ns4=snmp3-0.rrd:ns4:AVERAGE 'LINE1:ns4#ff0000:ns4' \ > > > > CDEF:avg=ns3,ns4,+,2,/ 'LINE2:avg#00ff00:avg' > > > > > > > > ( Both the required RRD files + samle output are in: > > > > http://www.morch.com/misc/rrdxport_bug/ ) > > > > > > > > rrdtool graph shows these values "correctly": > > > > http://www.morch.com/misc/rrdxport_bug/ok.png > > > > > > > > But as far as I can tell, rrdtool xport does not: > > > > http://www.morch.com/misc/rrdxport_bug/wrong.xml > > > > > > > > E.g. I would expect that exactly if either of the components (either of > > > > the two DEFs) are NaN, so would the average, but that seems not to be > > > > the case. Here are two example rows from wrong.xml: > > > > > > > > <row><t>1220627400</t><v>1.3481197778e+02</v><v>3.6073928446e-313</v><v>NaN</v></row> > > > > <row><t>1220626800</t><v>2.0573415556e+02</v><v>NaN</v><v>1.4496235778e+03</v></row> > > > > > > > > Also, the value of ns4 in the xport output is wrong when not NaN. I > > > > would have expected, that > > > > http://www.morch.com/misc/rrdxport_bug/wrong.xml > > > > only contain values of ns4 that are also present in > > > > http://www.morch.com/misc/rrdxport_bug/good.xml which agrees with the > > > > values in ok.png above. > > > > > > > > It sure looks to me like ok.png and wrong.xml disagree on what to show. > > > > And that ok.png/good.xml are "right". Do you agree? > > > > > > > > If this is a bug, should I file it in trac? I seem not to be able to > > > > create new bugs or register, only query existing bugs... Please let me > > > > know how if you want me to file a bug report. > > > > > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland > http://it.oetiker.ch [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 10:09:21 -0400 > From: Andy Riebs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [rrd-users] How to parse a log into a rrd graph? > To: [email protected] > Cc: digdug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > <re-sending from the correct address> > > Partly, I suppose it depends on your definition of "nice shape" :) > > Please send some information about your RRD definitions, and the > commands that you are using to > > a. Store the data > b. Generate the graph > > /andy > > On Friday 26 September 2008, digdug wrote: > > Hello, > > > > i have some logfiles, filled with accounting messages from my DSL > > router and want RRD to build a nice graph of the inbound and outbound > > traffic. The messages occures asynchronously, about every few > > seconds. They contain infos about how many bytes have bin received > > and send over the wire to that time. So the cumulated value over a > > given time period gives the ammount of data send/received in total. > > > > Now, i have written a parse for that logs getting: > > TIMESTAMP, BYTES-SEND, BYTES-RECEIVED > > > > Well, i feed that into an RRD but the resulting graph was > > frustrating. Instead of a nice shape i get only spikes in the graph, > > really ugly and unuseable. What do i do wrong? > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://n2.nabble.com/How-to-parse-a-log-into-a-rrd-graph--tp1120160p1 > >120160.html Sent from the RRDtool Users Mailinglist mailing list > > archive at Nabble.com. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rrd-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users > > > > -- > Andy Riebs > (w) +1.603.884.1521? ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (h) [EMAIL PROTECTED] > My opinions are not necessarily those of HP > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:15:44 +0200 (CEST) > From: Tobias Oetiker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [rrd-users] RRDtool 1.3.2 released (MAJOR BUGFIX!) > To: Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > Hi Bernard, > > thanks > tobi > > Friday Bernard Li wrote: > > > Hi Tobias: > > > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Tobias Oetiker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > if you tell me what needs changeing I can build this into the > > > release process ... I thought I have already been doing that with > > > the version number, but maybe it fails (I do not use rpms myself, > > > so I am living in a state of blissful ignorance). > > > > Attached is a patch against the spec file shipped with > > rrdtool-1.3.3.spec which will make it buildable (at least it works on > > my CentOS 4.x system). > > > > If you have any questions, please feel free to let me know. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Bernard > > > > -- > Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland > http://it.oetiker.ch [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:09:32 +0600 > From: "Firdous Saleheen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [rrd-users] MRTG-RRD anomaly!! > To: <[email protected]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]@mango.com.bd> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hi, > > We have created MRTG(with RRD support) configuration for two interfaces and > one for the aggregation of those two interfaces. > > MRTG of two interfaces are working well but the aggregation graph sometimes > is showing wrong graph. It seems it is just forgetting to sum up the graphs. > > > > i.e. > > interface 1 current in: 64.93Mb out:18.04Mb > > interface 2 current in:59.33 Mb out:3.12Mb > > int1+int2 current in :11.32 Mb out: 21.17Mb > > > > Interestingly, only IN traffic of aggregation is affected, not OUT traffic. > > > > The configuration files are as follows: > > > > HtmlDir: /var/www/mrtg > > ImageDir: /var/www/mrtg > > LogDir: /var/lib/mrtg > > ThreshDir: /var/lib/mrtg > > > > EnableIPv6: no > > Options[]:growright,bits > > LogFormat:rrdtool > > > > #Interface 1 > > > > Title[s]: S Traffic Analysis > > Target[s]: 29:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > setENV[s]:MRTG_INT_IP="202.18.133.34" MRTG_INT__DESCR="POS 0/0/2/0" > > MaxBytes[s]: 2000000000 > > > > #Interface2 > > > > Title[t]: T Traffic Analysis > > Target[t]: 34:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > setENV[t]:MRTG_INT_IP="203.22.98.46" MRTG_INT__DESCR="POS 0/0/2/1" > > MaxBytes[t]: 2000000000 > > > > #Interface1+interface 2 > > > > Title[submarine]: SUBMARINE Traffic Analysis > > Target[submarine]: 29:[EMAIL PROTECTED] + 34:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > setENV[submarine]:MRTG_INT_IP="" MRTG_INT__DESCR="" > > MaxBytes1[submarine]: 40000000000 > > MaxBytes2[submarine]: 40000000000 > > > > There are 3 separate config files. > > We have generated log files using - -logging and - - debug command. - - > debug command is with "log,base,snpo" parameters and found no error. > > > > Have anyone faced this problem? > > > > Please advise. > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > Firdous Saleheen > > Engineer > > Mango Teleservices Limited > > 82,Mohakhali C/A,(12th floor), > > Dhaka-1212. > > E-mail - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Telephone- +880 37 71800500, +880 37 71800501 > > Cell- +8801730068832 > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/rrd-users/attachments/20080929/afb86537/attachment.html > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > rrd-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users > > > End of rrd-users Digest, Vol 21, Issue 15 > ***************************************** > _________________________________________________________________________ In 5 Schritten zur eigenen Homepage. Jetzt Domain sichern und gestalten! Nur 3,99 EUR/Monat! http://www.maildomain.web.de/?mc=021114 _______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
