Thanks for the help. You were correct! All I had to do was add '::::2' to the end of my Target[] lines and it worked.
Chris Big Wave Dave wrote: > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Chris Fogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I have read the lists and googled, but cannot figure out why rrdtool >> graphs all values over 100M incorrectly.I have checked my .rrd files and >> the values in the db are the correct values. >> >> In this example you will see at 8:30am, the traffic goes to 145M, but is >> graphing at 45M instead, and does this for all values over 100M, then at >> ~14:00, the value drops back down under 100M and it graphs normally again. >> >> Below is the code used to generate it... >> >> Thanks, >> Chris >> >> #!/bin/bash >> rrdtool graph /var/www/localhost/htdocs/development/pngs/day/$1.png \ >> --rigid \ >> --upper-limit 200000000 \ >> --title "Port Bandwidth" \ >> --interlace --imgformat PNG \ >> --width=700 --height=150 \ >> --start "now -16h" \ >> --watermark "`date`" \ >> -v Bandwidth \ >> DEF:a=/var/www/localhost/htdocs/development/rrds/$2/$1.rrd:ds0:AVERAGE \ >> DEF:b=/var/www/localhost/htdocs/development/rrds/$2/$1.rrd:ds1:AVERAGE \ >> CDEF:alpha=8,a,* \ >> CDEF:beta=8,b,* \ >> CDEF:zeta=a,8,*,b,8,*,GT,a,8,*,b,8,*,IF,PREV,GT,a,8,*,b,8,*,GT,a,8,*,b,8,*,IF,PREV,IF >> \ >> COMMENT:"\t avg. max last \n" \ >> AREA:zeta#aaaa55:Tot \ >> GPRINT:zeta:AVERAGE:" %4.2lf %s" \ >> GPRINT:zeta:MAX:"%4.2lf %s" \ >> GPRINT:zeta:LAST:"%4.2lf %s\n" \ >> LINE1:beta#ff0000:Out \ >> GPRINT:beta:AVERAGE:" %4.2lf %s" \ >> GPRINT:beta:MAX:"%4.2lf %s" \ >> GPRINT:beta:LAST:"%4.2lf %s\n" \ >> LINE1:alpha#0000ff:In. \ >> GPRINT:alpha:AVERAGE:" %4.2lf %s" \ >> GPRINT:alpha:MAX:"%4.2lf %s" \ >> GPRINT:alpha:LAST:"%4.2lf %s\n" >> >> -- >> Chris Fogel, InterMetro Communications, Inc. >> 805.433.8000/o, 805.433.0049/d, 805.582.1006/f >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.InterMetro.Net >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rrd-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users >> >> > > I have seen this when graphing a 32-bit SNMP value that "wraps" when > it exceeds a 32-bit size. I ended up having to change the SNMP > queries to use a 64-bit counter. > > Dave > -- Chris Fogel, InterMetro Communications, Inc. 805.433.8000/o, 805.433.0049/d, 805.582.1006/f [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.InterMetro.Net _______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
