2009/4/13 Tobias Oetiker <[email protected]>: > yes, because it is over the maximum periode duration, so the next > sample will establish the start of the new periode ...
I've done some tests and I concluded that the RRA timespan is always between two points that verify TIME%(rrd_step*rra_steps)==0. Is this correct? What will the sample time decide about the periode in this case...? > from what you tell here I can not see what is going wrong ... best > is, if you write a little demo script to show your problem ... On the rrdtool fetch I provided, >> >> >1239617640: 9.9586069400e+02 1.7373722021e+01 5.6504290012e+01 >> >> >1239617700: 9.9586000000e+02 1.7776053280e+01 5.7130494367e+01 >> >> >1239617760: nan nan nan >> >> >1239617820: nan nan nan >> >> >1239617880: 9.8159131106e+02 1.9585499172e+01 4.9668510483e+01 >> >> >1239617940: 9.9584083364e+02 2.0126658206e+01 5.0490830009e+01 >> >> >1239618000: 9.9583079547e+02 2.0435340373e+01 5.1061476218e+01 You can see a low-value of 981.59 for the first DS after the NaN time. I didn't entered any value lower than 995.8, so that cannot be a average! Nuno _______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
