On Oct 12, 2009, at 7:11 PM, kssgill wrote:
> Very interesting ... I was relying on sleep(20) for the updates to
> be 20sec apart which caused the average function to adjust the value.
I don't think that sleep was the problem. It probably was right on
most or all of the time. I expect that your problem was that your
start time was off and you were consistently entering the data x
number of seconds ahead or behind your buckets.
buckets at 20 40 60 80 100
data entered at 18 38 58 78 98
--
Marc
_______________________________________________
rrd-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users