Hi Stoyan, I just had a look at what was changed with that patch in the two files you mention, and I don't get why this should affect your compiler (while the rest of rrdtool which is written the same way does work) ... any ideas ?
cheers tobi Dec 1 Stoyan Angelov wrote: > On 12/01/09 12:52, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > > > no, i have not tried to use gcc... i will do so. i used hp's compiler for > > > previous versions 1.3.4 and 1.3.8 and wanted to use it for 1.4.2 too. > > > > hmmm there should be no all that substantial changes in rrdtool at > > that level, so it 1.3.8 works you should be able to get 1.4.2 to > > work too ... I don't know much about hp compilers though, so the > > error message does not ring a bell ... I bet it is trivial to fix > > for someone in the know ... > > > > hi Tobias, > > i was able to compile rrdtool 1.4.2 with hp's compiler. i had to modify > rrd_getopt.c and rrd_getopt1.c by removing the changes introduced by revision > 1677 (win32 portability patch...). > i will create a hp-ux depot and will publish it on my site. > > can you please make a small change on the download page - binary distributions > section (http://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool/download.en.html), the hp-ux download > link is correct (http://www.filibeto.org/~aduritz/truetrue/rrdtool/) however > the text on the page itself says > "http://www.filibeto.org/~aduritz/truetrue/rrdtool/1.3.4";. can you please > remove the 1.3.4 sufix? > > > thanks! > > Stoyan > > > > -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland http://it.oetiker.ch [email protected] ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 _______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
