Tobias Oetiker wrote:
>
> Instead of
>
> $t=time();
>
> rrdtool update ${t}:x
>
> do
>
> rrdtool update (${t}-${step}):U
> rrdtool update ${t}:x
That seems to be the best route. I think I may actually just dump the
value in twice rather than include a U. My current thinking is to set up
the RRD file with a step of 60. I'll only actually update it every 300
seconds. Each update will include t-step:value and t:value. And the
highest resolution RRA will aggregate 5 steps with a XFF of 80. I'll
have to experiement a little bit to nail down the details exactly. Thanks,
-David Mitchell
>
> cheers
> tobi
>
>> -David Mitchell
>>
>>
>
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| David Mitchell ([email protected]) Network Engineer IV |
| Tel: (303) 497-1845 National Center for |
| FAX: (303) 497-1818 Atmospheric Research |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rrd-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
