Today Marc MERLIN wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 07:52:06AM -0700, Philip Peake wrote: > > Yes ... I am actually measuring two parameters. > > One of them has fairly high numbers (in the 100's), the interpolation > > (or whatever you want to call it) is ok there. The actual number > > displayed is not too important as long as its something like right. > > > > The second set of samples are more like: > > > > 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 > > > > They are integer values. Displaying them as (for example) 0.666732134 is > > meaningless. > > So if you don't have a workaround, at this point the fix is to give Tobias a > patch that doesn't break the common case.
just align your samples to the RRD step and you get what you want cheers tobi > > Marc > -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland http://it.oetiker.ch [email protected] ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 _______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
