On 10/23/2010 11:44 PM, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > Hi Philip, > > about storing NAN, I would suggest the following: > > Yesterday Philip Peake wrote: > >> On 10/23/2010 10:49 AM, Simon Hobson wrote: >>> I don't want to see what's in the database. Please provide a set of >>> update values that reproduce the problem. If we don't know what went >>> in, then we cannot even guess at whether what comes out is correct or >>> not. >> Ok - added a print of the data that is supplied to rrdtool, then dropped >> the connection to force a read error. >> >> This is what was passed to the DB: >> >> 1287865680:80720496:21353409:88678191:121292820:21641300:65478015:23557328:95055770:104725771 >> 1287865710:80721285:21354274:88679077:121294030:21642052:65480082:23558714:95056884:104726886 >> 1287865740:80722122:21355290:88679970:121294992:21642728:65482047:23559995:95057766:104728008 >> 1287865770:80723194:21356148:88680872:121295888:21643313:65484024:23561517:95058921:104729359 > 1287865780:U:U:U:U:U:U:U:U:U > 1287865781:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 >> 1287865830:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 >> 1287865860:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 >> 1287865890:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 >> 1287865920:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 >> 1287865950:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 >> 1287865980:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 >> 1287866010:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 >> 1287866040:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 >> 1287866070:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 >> 1287866100:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 >> 1287866130:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 >> 1287866160:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 >> 1287866190:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 >> 1287866220:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 >> 1287866250:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 >> 1287866280:80739444:21371669:88696608:121313195:21655956:65519543:23582106:95072573:104743263 >> 1287866310:80740228:21372452:88697358:121314100:21656508:65521468:23583236:95073263:104743944 >> 1287866340:80740899:21373269:88698173:121315111:21657190:65523385:23584208:95073908:104744613 >> 1287866370:80741789:21374232:88699086:121316178:21657895:65525380:23585369:95074622:104745350 > also note that you might rather want to use > > DERIVE instead of GAUGE with a value range from 0 to the maximum > rate. > > This will turn counter restes into Unknown automatically and will > not do any 32bit or 64bit counter wrap magic. > > cheers > tobi >
I am using COUNTER not GAUGE. What I am interested in is the number of events per period, not the cumulative total, which is what the data source provides, so I'm looking at the difference between successive samples. Philip _______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
