thanks, thanks, thanks
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:38:39 -0800 From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Re: RRDTOOL Good with step 300, Bad with step 600 xajepa wrote: >If I chose a step 600 (not equal to 300), it is bad : >Bad Code : >rrdtool create ${FICRRD}.rrd --step 600 --start 978303900 >DS:b600:GAUGE:600:0:U \ > RRA:AVERAGE:0:1:3 > rrdtool update ${FICRRD}.rrd \ > 978304500:2 \ > 978305100:1 \ > 978305700:4 978304500 is not an integer multiple of 600 - therefore your data it normalised into buckets that start/end on times that are. http://www.vandenbogaerdt.nl/rrdtool/ See "Rates, normalizing and consolidating" -- Simon Hobson Visit http://www.magpiesnestpublishing.co.uk/ for books by acclaimed author Gladys Hobson. Novels - poetry - short stories - ideal as Christmas stocking fillers. Some available as e-books. _______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:http://rrd-mailinglists.937164.n2.nabble.com/RRDTOOL-Good-with-step-300-Bad-with-step-600-tp6162917p6162953.html To unsubscribe from RRDTOOL Good with step 300, Bad with step 600, click here. -- View this message in context: http://rrd-mailinglists.937164.n2.nabble.com/RRDTOOL-Good-with-step-300-Bad-with-step-600-tp6162917p6168130.html Sent from the RRDtool Users Mailinglist mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
