At first, thank you for such a fast reply! > or if you want to go even further, set the MRHB > to 60s and then supply three fake updates, 1s min, 1s max and a > large 58s with whatever is necessary to create the right average
This was my very first idea but I haven't dared to even send it to this list. Sould this "ugly tripple update" be approved by You, Tobi, I am going to use it :-) >> A side note: why, under usual conditions (not the example above), >> should I define RRAs with steps=1 for all the aggregates I want to >> then use with steps>1? (examine any RRD file with "rrdtool info" to >> see several RRAs with steps=1). RRA with steps=1 does not consolidate >> data, it only stores them: it is enough to have only one such a RRA... > > yes it is enough ... So is it a common mistake of scripts built upon rrdtool to define several RRAs with steps=1? Will the "rrdtool graph" take (for example) data from RRA:AVERAGE::1 when requested to draw recent MAX of a DS (and there is no RRA:MAX::1 present)? Milan _______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
