Alex van den Bogaerdt <[email protected]> wrote:

> The other option is to modify the documentation to match the source.

How about changing it to "first value in the RRA", plus a note along the lines 
of :
"The value returned will always be the timestamp of the last completed entry in 
the RRA minus the timespan covered by the RRA*. For RRAs which cover a timespan 
longer than the periods covered by updates, the returned value will predate the 
first update."

There are probably better words to express it, but they aren't flowing through 
my mind at the moment :(
* Is this the correct description ?

_______________________________________________
rrd-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users

Reply via email to