Peter A. Menzel <[email protected]> wrote: > I actually found some missing update values - that means not every second a > new set of values. > > Now I intent to tune the heartbeat value to 5 instead of 2, > and step size of 1 remain constant... > So missing 1, 2 or 3 measures will not generate an *unknown* value in the RRD. > > Do you think that is the right way?
It's probably the right thing to do and my guess is that it will "cure" your gaps - but really it's your data, you have to decide whether it's right for your needs. Some people want to see the unknowns, others want to "ride over" them. _______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
