I wouldn't say renumbering is always testable, is reliable and is secure. But I think there are a large number of use cases that this is not a problem.
Moreover, IMHO there are use cases where server farms needs very high availability and this could be provided by using many PA addresses, multi-homing and automatic renumbering with DNS Dynamic Update. Teco. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Robin > Whittle > Verzonden: maandag 27 oktober 2008 6:21 > Aan: RRG > CC: Randall Atkinson > Onderwerp: [rrg] Renumbering can never be secure, testable, reliable or > routine - draft-carpenter-renum-needs-work > > Short version: Renumbering of end-user networks can never be > sufficiently testable, reliable or secure to > be in any sense "routine". > > Therefore, we cannot expect to have a routing > scaling solution which depends on such > "routine" renumbering be accepted by the vast > majority of end-user network administrators - > which is a requirement, since we need to get > almost all such networks to adopt it. <skip> > > - Robin > > > _______________________________________________ > rrg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
