|Indeed. Actually it escaped via RFC 1881 (December 1995), and it was
|intentional. I personally believe that the registries have made it
|too easy to get PI prefixes, but that was a choice of the operational
|community. However, it doesn't change what I was trying to say,
|which is that the *design* assumption for IPv6 was PA, so it seems
|appropriate to call that Plan A.


Interesting.  So you're saying that it's perfectly ok for the operational
folks to set aside the stated routing architecture and do something else?

Tony

_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to