If EID-prefixes are allocated from RIRs, we can have structure. That
is what the LISP architecture defines. Since it's a different
namespace from the RLOC namespace, it's aggregation boundaries (in the
address itself) can be different.
Dino
On Jan 4, 2009, at 5:10 PM, Xu Xiaohu wrote:
|The simple/short answer is because they are being used as IDs.
And this is an architectural bug that we should endeavour to
fix, not propagate.
If we want to use ID in the ACL, should it also have some structure in
semantics? since the flat ID will cause a scaling issue with ACL and
a huge
burden for manually configuration.
Xiaohu
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg