I was given a list of IETF lists to post this to. The RRG
list was added later. Please excuse any excessive
cross-posting.
Dave
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:07:44AM -0800, David Meyer wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> The IESG would like to know whether people believe that
> we can go directly to our first LISP WG meeting at the
> next IETF, or if another WG forming BOF is necessary.
>
> Here are the current facts on the ground:
>
> o We have fairly mature set of core drafts
> o There are a number of other (non-core) LISP drafts
> o Significant global deployment is underway
> o We have 2 (or more) implementations
> o We have been discussing a draft charter (see update below)
>
> The question is that I would like folks to respond to is
> "Should a WG be formed based on the draft agenda
> (see below), or should we have another BOF?"
>
> Please give your opinion as soon as possible so we can
> close on these administrative issues.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dave
> --
>
> LISP (Locator/ID Separation Protocol)
>
> Last Modified: 2009-01-20
>
> Chair(s):
> TBD
>
> Internet Area Director(s):
> TBD
>
> Routing Area Advisor:
> TBD
>
> Secretary(ies):
> TBD
>
> Mailing Lists:
> General Discussion: [email protected]
>
> Description of Working Group:
>
> LISP and companion documents (see below) are proposals that
> respond to the problems discussed at the IAB's October, 2006
> Routing and Addressing Workshop [0]. The purpose of the BOF is to
> form a working group whose charter (see below) is to work on the
> design on the LISP base protocol [1], the LISP+ALT mapping system
> [2], LISP Interworking [4] and LISP multicast [6]. The working
> group will encourage and support interoperable LISP
> implementations as well as defining requirements for alternate
> mapping systems. The Working Group may also create EID-prefix
> assignment guidelines for RIRs, as well as security profiles for
> the ALT (presumably using technology developed in the SIDR
> working group).
>
> Goals and Milestones:
>
> Mar 2010 Submit base LISP specification to the IESG for
> Experimental.
>
> Mar 2010 Submit base ALT specification to the IESG for
> Experimental.
>
> Mar 2010 Submit the LISP Interworking specification to the IESG
> for Experimental.
>
> June 2010 Submit Recommendations for Allocation and Routing
> of both EIDs and RLOCs to the IESG for Experimental.
>
> June 2010 Submit Recommendations for Securing the LISP Mapping
> System to the IESG for Experimental.
>
> July 2010 Submit LISP for Multicast Environments to the IESG for
> Experimental.
>
> Aug 2010 Re-charter or close.
>
> Internet-Drafts:
> draft-farinacci-lisp-11.txt
> draft-farinacci-lisp-multicast-01.txt
> draft-fuller-lisp-alt-03.txt
> draft-lewis-lisp-interworking-02.txt
>
> Request For Comments:
> None
>
>
> References
> ----------
> [0] Meyer, D. et. al., "Report from the IAB Workshop on
> Routing and Addressing", RFC 4984.
>
> [1] Farinacci, D. et. al., "Locator/ID Separation Protocol
> (LISP)", draft-farinacci-lisp-11.txt.
>
> [2] Fuller, V., et. al., "LISP Alternative Topology
> (LISP-ALT)", draft-fuller-lisp-alt-03.txt
>
> [3] Iannone, L., and O. Bonaventure, "OpenLISP Implementation
> Report", draft-iannone-openlisp-implementation-00.txt.
>
> [4] Lewis, D., et. al., "Interworking LISP with IPv4 and
> IPv6", draft-lewis-lisp-interworking-02.txt.
>
> [5] Mathy, L., et. al., "LISP-DHT: Towards a DHT to map
> identifiers onto locators", draft-mathy-lisp-dht-00.txt.
>
> [6] Farinacci, D., Meyer, D., Zwiebel, J., and S. Venaas,
> "LISP for Multicast Environments",
> draft-farinacci-lisp-multicast-01.txt.
>
> _______________________________________________
> routing-discussion mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
