> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表
> Noel Chiappa
> 发送时间: 2009年1月23日 12:53
> 收件人: [email protected]
> 主题: Re: [rrg] [Int-area] Please respond: Questions from the
> IESG astowhether a WG forming BOF is necessary for LISP
>
> > From: Xu Xiaohu <[email protected]>
>
> > The to-be-formed WG should not only focus on LISP, but
> also focus on
> > other map&encap solutions.
>
> The problem is that if you diffuse the WG focus like this, it
> will slow things down.
Sure. However, routing scalability is an important issue, but is it also a
urgent issue? if not, slowing down a little may not be a concern. On the
contrary, it will help us consider things more comprehensively
> The IETF practise in the past has
> been, when there are multiple protocols which overlap in
> functionality, to do each one in a separate WG precisely so
> each can focus on their own protocol.
It's also a reasonable way. However, we would have to form a lot of
"liaisons" to share information and experience among these separate WGs.
Xiaohu
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
