> From: Robin Whittle <[email protected]>
>> I don't think the people working on LISP are trying to "convince" the
>> IETF as a whole of the "merits of LISP".
> I don't know the criteria is for creating a WG, but I guess the IETF
> doesn't create them except for projects which have sufficient merit in
> general
Sure - but that is not in contradiction to my statement above. The IETF has a
long history of creating WG's to work on different alternatives. In such
circumstances, WG's simply serve to create standards in an _open_ way; they
do not in any way imply any sort of official IETF preference.
> I think the LISP team could best facilitate progress towards scalable
> routing solutions by ... discussing in public why they think their
> LISP-ALT approach is better than the alternatives.
The community has been discussing these issues for years, going back to
things like Multi6. It's been discussed to death already.
Noel
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
