> |Also distinguish reversible and non-reversible translation. > > > I agree with the differentiation, but I'm really less interested in refining > the taxonomy from section 3.1 unless there's some clear, tangible benefit. > At this point, I'm much more interested in putting our efforts into the > section 3.3 approach.
Fair enough, but I think that from the point of view of making referrals and any other "address" dependencies in upper layers work, reversible translation is in itself a clear benefit, almost isomorphic with encap/decap. Brian _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
