Hi Robin,
|I disagree with your apparent view that the 3.1 taxonomy is adequate |as it stands: Then you mistake my intent completely. The taxonomy in 3.1 is inadequate and not particularly helpful and not really worth further refinement. It's included mostly out of completeness. Tony _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
