I understand this is a proposed change to the LISP protocol.  I guess
it is independent of the work of the main LISP-ALT team, who have
updated their main I-D and added a new one:

 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fuller-lisp-ms-00
 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farinacci-lisp-12

in recent days, in ways which seem unrelated to your suggestion.

Yes the two efforts are completely independent and not related.

Dino

_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to