I understand this is a proposed change to the LISP protocol. I guess
it is independent of the work of the main LISP-ALT team, who have
updated their main I-D and added a new one:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fuller-lisp-ms-00
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farinacci-lisp-12
in recent days, in ways which seem unrelated to your suggestion.
Yes the two efforts are completely independent and not related.
Dino
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg