Hi Teco,
Thanks for your comments and your patience in waiting for me to get back
to you.
Teco Boot wrote:
I prefer a tiny but very important adjustment in B1c
Was:
B1c Semi-hierarchical locators are administratively assigned. Local
reconnection during link state changes is accomplished with
rerouting instead of renumbering.
Suggestion:
B1c Semi-hierarchical locators are administratively or automatically
assigned. Local reconnection during link state changes is
accomplished with rerouting instead of renumbering.
Sure.
Only major criticisms 3.3.2.3. #1 applies to B1c, and I have
problems with the wording.
Was:
1. This strategy is probably not compatible with UDP or TCP though
B1a/c could be compatible with IPv6's layer 3. The replacement
layer-4/5 protocols should also be coaxable to run on top of
IPv4's layer 3 in the not-yet-upgraded part of the network.
I see no reason why it is not compatible. It must be for obvious reasons.
The problem is that the locator would still be part of the
pseudo-header. How do you do the checksum calculation if the locator
selection happens after the packet leaves the transport layer and is to
be transmitted?
Tony
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
