Noel Chiappa wrote:
There is simply no way to produce a definition which both i) completely and accurately describes all the uses to which an IPvN address is currently put, and ii) is short and crisp.
So true. And it would seem that i) is a clear indication of the amount of overloading that we've applied to the IPv4 namespace.
Tony _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
