On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> wrote: > The last analysis I saw is that anycast is in some sense a fiction. That is, > it is not meaningful to describe an anycast IP "address" as an address > according to any of the useful definitions of address. > Rather, it is a name for a collection of things. > We have merely overloaded the routing system so as to route on that > particular kind of name.
Joel, So you see an abnormality here, not a pattern in the evolution of routing? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
