Hi Fred,

> > What happens when the EID needs to change its RLOC (for provider
> > independence),
> 
> Changing the RLOC obviously changes the EID prefix. Those
> who are lucky enough to have provider-independent RLOCs
> will not have a problem with this. Those that don't would
> incur a site-wide renumbering event if they changed
> providers. But, the goal here is to support automatic mapping
> between core DFZ routers with public IPv4 addresses that
> would presumably be stable; we would not want this scheme
> to penetrate deeply beyond the core DFZ routers, and would
> instead use some stateful map/encaps scheme within end sites.

One of the major goals for id/locator split is to make the identifier
provider-independent. Embedding the RLOC in the EID will damage this goal.

> > or use multiple RLOCs (for multihoming)?
> 
> The proposal is that multiple site border routers would
> configure the same IPv4 RLOC in anycast fashion to give
> multihoming. Another name that someone suggested for
> this scheme was "multihomed 6to4"

For a multi-homed site, its multiple border routers should use the same IPv4
RLOC in anycast fashion. It means each multi-homed site should be allocated
a unique RLOC. I wonder whether such kind of RLOC is still topologically
aggregatable in provider networks.

Xiaohu

> > The whole point of 'separation of location and identity' is that it
> > requires a binding. TANSTAAFL.
> 
> The major point to be made is that there are different
> considerations within different domains of application.
> Instead of saying "TANSTAAFL", I would rather say "there
> is no one size fits all".
> 
> So, stateless mapping using 6to4++ within the core where
> addresses are more stable, and stateful mapping nearer the
> edges where addresses are more volatile is what is being
> proposed here.
> 
> Fred
> [email protected]
> 
> >
> >     Noel
> _______________________________________________
> rrg mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to