> Probably we need/could use a taxonomy of names like NAT66-<foo> and > NAT66-<bar> to describe the various variants of NAT66. > > Noel
Yes. And I pointed to a draft that defines (let's say) NAT66-mrw. Brian _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
