OK, in fact, I do know all yours are for good intention. Only that your list of constraints would be used as a kind of guiding lights. Not as an absolute measure to cut off branches.
Mostly, your constraints are common-sense, well-intended. Good to bear in mind. But, let's leave room where we have to inevitably or for good persuading reason break the walls and not to meet to some or quite a number of them. On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Robin Whittle <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello DY, > > You wrote: > > > So, it pretty much seems that we're practically left with only two > > candidates alive by now. All others practically gone. Let alone any > > other new coming proposals, considering that most of those renowned old > > proposals even have not survived. > > > > I only have to read two proposals. Thank you for saving my time. > > I am not tying to discourage you from reading anything. If you > disagree with anything I wrote, please write in detail about what you > believe and why - that will be a good discussion. > > Likewise, if you think my attempt at listing the constraints is > unrealistic, please sugggest improvements. > > - Robin > > -- Regards, DY http://cnu.kr/~dykim
_______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
