On Dec 14, 2009, at 6:58 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
......
Or, at least, that's my theory - and I'm sticking to it! :-)
Also I feel it should support hierarchy, even if we don't need a
hierarchy from the start.
Hierarchy in the names in the namespaces, or a hierarchy _of_
namespaces?
Sorry, wasn't quite clear from your brief comment.
I was thinking about a hierarchy of namespaces, but in fact we
probably
need the generality to support hierarchical names too. I don't think
that
needs to make the simple case inefficient. Just make a couple of the
basic
data definitions recursive, and you've got both hierarchies.
Brian
a clarification question: wonder what is the "name space" referred to
in the above?
Lixia
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
