In einer eMail vom 02.02.2010 19:15:07 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt [email protected]:
Patrick Frejborg wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Noel Chiappa <[email protected]> wrote: >> > From: Patrick Frejborg <[email protected]> >> >> >> Ah, no - LEID's are globally visible, and globally unique. >> >> > Do they really need to be globally visible and globally unique in the >> > future? >> >> Yes - they need to be globally visible because they are the names that >> endpoints use to identify each other, and you may want to talk to another >> endpoint anywhere (hence the need for global scope). >> > If you take the core-edge philosophy and apply that on the address > space - creating a hierarchical address space the endpoints can still > be identified though they use the same edge space. With LISP terms, if > the RLOC is telling the attachment point to Internet and the EID is > telling the attachment point at the local network you have a two level > address space. And the local network address space can be reused if > the global address space is unique - similar as in PSTN but without > geographical boundaries, it should follow as much as possible the AS > and RIR structures that is in place (some trade offs are needed). > Maybe I'm missing something but what happens when a mobile endpoint changes its point of attachment in the hierarchical address space to a new location that might just be using the same "edge space address" to identify another endpoint? Florin Very good question :-) Heiner
_______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
