On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Danny McPherson <da...@arbor.net> wrote:

> Each of those unique routes for a given prefix means more everything,
> including FIB I/O.  IPv6 during long term transitional coexistence with
> IPv4 is just going to compound this.

I really think that the conversation about ipv4/ipv6 and route-scaling
has to understand that for the foreseeable future we're going to have
to deal with both ip protocols... and in 25-30 (maybe more) years a
third protocol.

rrg mailing list

Reply via email to