Hi, Robin, PoA: Point of Attachment, aka, interface.
The current IP addresses name the interface(PoA), not the node(host/router). It seems ILNP proposes to - name the node by ID, and - name the subnet by Locator. So, with ILNP, neither name the interface, which I buy the most. Regards, DY On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 12:37 AM, RJ Atkinson <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 01 Apr 2010, at 08:56, someone wrote: >> The available documents at your site: >> >> http://ilnp.cs.st-andrews.ac.uk/ >> >> consists of 3 talks from 2008, 4 Internet Drafts and 10 papers. >> Do you expect ... anyone ... interested in ILNP to read through >> all of these ... > > It seems entirely reasonable to expect that participants in the > RRG would at least read the applicable Internet-Drafts first. > I did that for multiple proposals. Most other Routing RG folks > also did that for multiple proposals. This is common practice > and normal expectation in the IRTF (and for that matter, in the > IETF also). > > It isn't difficult or especially time consuming to scan through > viewgraphs, so many people would choose to do that as a fast way > to learn the basics of any proposal. Often having graphics > helps makes ideas more clear. > > IRTF Routing RG time, including ILNP, is not part of my job, > unlike for some people here. Regrettably that really does > mean that my time available for RRG is limited. > > Yours, > > Ran > > PS: I'll try to get my colleague to update the ILNP project > web site, but that could take several days to happen... > > _______________________________________________ > rrg mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg > _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
