Hi Xiaohu,
> My concern is how could the transport layer distinguish session A (Locator > A, Identifier I, Nonce N, Destination D) from session B (Locator B, > Identifier I, Nonce K, Destination D) once we use the trick mentioned below. The transport layer connection lookup is keyed by (I, N, D). Regards, Tony >>> " With this proposal, transport protocols include only the >>> Identifier in their pseudo-header calculations, but do not >>> include the Locator in their pseudo-header calculations. >>> >>> To minimise the changes required within transport protocol >>> implementations, when this proposal is in use for a >>> communications session, the Locator fields are zeroed for >>> the purpose of transport-layer pseudo-header calculations. >>> " >> >> >> Since the current TCP/UDP checksum is just a straight summation, zeroing > out >> the bits or excluding them are functionally identical and that what you >> propose binds us to one implementation approach unnecessarily. _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
