>> RSVP is not widely deployed for per-flow QoS, and never has been. An >> obvious question would be whether LDP is more widely deployed than RSVP >> (e.g. in an MPLS context). I don't have any data on relative use of LDP vs >> RSVP for MPLS signalling. > > They are both in widespread use so neither can be ignored. > That's right. My previous company, a tier-1 ISP with world-wide presence, heavily depend on RSVP/MPLS to do traffic engineering. LDP is also used but more deployed to extend MPLS LSP to the edge, it's mainly because LDP is simpler to config but cannot do TE.
Best, Leon _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
