-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: RJ Atkinson <[email protected]> An: IRTF Routing RG <[email protected]> Verschickt: Mo., 17. Mai. 2010, 20:48 Thema: [rrg] Re; ILNP Earlier, Heiner Hummel wrote: % What is the namespace for the ILNP locator ? Tony's answer is quite correct for ILNPv6, which is the best documented case. The ILNPv6 Locator is simply a 64-bit topologically relevant "IPv6 Routing Prefix". Noel's answer is similarly correct for ILNPv4. The ILNPv4 Locator is simply a 32-bit topologically relevant "IPv4 Routing Prefix". Question: topologically relevant means "is a bit string which is not used by TCP" ? But what is its intrinsic ordering ? Is it an aggregatable information or rather not? Later, Noel Chiappa asked: % However, on the IPv6 side, I don't know how ILNPv6 nodes % would carry the ILNPv4 node's locator - perhaps in an ... option? Using an option is clearly one possible design choice. The simplest design option might be just to map a 32-bit IPv4 prefix into the ILNPv6 Locator field in a structured way. RFC-4291, Section 2.5.5, defines at least 2 different ways that such a mapping might be performed. Yours, Ran _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
_______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
