Let me rephrase.
o I have one and only one number for my node.
o I call it 'node address' rather than ID.
o There's no extra node 'locator' (which you mean apparently by 'IP
address')
* as an implementation choice, I used the IP address as my node address,
not as the address of the interface (PoA).
See slide 4 of my file. I'd try to repeat it below, too.
node <- node addr (= IP addr)
| \
| \
| \
mac addr -> LAN 3G <- L2 addr
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Noel Chiappa <[email protected]>
wrote:
> > From: Dae Young KIM <[email protected]>
>
> > I would redefine the context of IP address and use an IP address as
> > my node address. (IP addr now pointing to the node, not to the
> > interface.)
>
> Whatever.
>
> OK, so let me ask the question again: let's take our hypothetical node
> which has two links, one to a wireless LAN, and one to 3G mobile phone
> network.
>
> What is the node's 'IP address'?
>
> Noel
>
--
Regards,
DY
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
