Hi all,

It's now considerably after the official close of this poll.

As of this writing, there were 33 responses, of which 1 is clearly invalid.
That leaves us with 32 valid responses.

Statement 1 has (20/32) 65.6% agreement.
Statement 2 has (26/32) 81% agreement.
Statement 3 has (32/32) 100% agreement.
Statement 4 has (31/32) 97% agreement.

All of these clearly represent rough consensus.  However, I would be happier
if Statement 1 had a slightly more decisive consensus.  Therefore, I'd like
to ask the group to continue to discuss, refine, and repeat the poll on a
revised version of Statement 1.  I suspect that simple wordsmithing will
suffice.

The other 3 statements will show up in the next rev of the document.

Regards,
Tony



On 5/24/10 10:58 AM, "RJ Atkinson" <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> The poll closes in just under 1 hour (from when I write this note).
> If anyone has not yet participated and would like to do so,
> PLEASE go do so RIGHT NOW.  As a reminder, the poll URL remains:
> <http://www.doodle.com/z5s9yq8kt73eua9t>
> 
> As I write this, there are 31 valid participants, and one
> spoilt ballot.  Votes are public, visible via the above URL.
> 
> For the record, no one has been censored, although someone
> failed in an attempt at humour by entering a spoilt ballot
> which s/he herself/himself labelled "Censored by...".
> 
> Under IRTF process rules, determination of RG consensus is
> the privilege of the RG chairs.
> 
> So, purely as an observation, not a consensus determination,
> most current (13:52 EDT, 24th May 2010) participants support
> all 4 statements.
> Statement 1 currently has (19/31 or ~61%) agreed.
> Statement 2 currently has (25/31 or ~81%) agreed.
> Statement 3 currently has (31/31 or 100%) agreed.
> Statement 4 currently has (30/31 or ~97%) agreed.
> 
> Personally, I am encouraged by all this.
> 
> Yours,
> 
> Ran
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rrg mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg


_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to