On 5 June 2010 at 02:32:03 Tony Li sent:
> 
> > But there is one certain point of intersection of addressing, forwarding and
> > path selection:
> > As clear an address shows a node's topological location, that much it
> > facilitates hop by hop path selection to that node, says: decision making 
> > for
> > forwarding, sequentially.
> > 
> > So why not just embed next hops in an address: locator?
> 
> 
> So then the locator is basically a detailed path that has to change anytime
> there's a topology change along the path.

Yes. But having named nodes as hops, the topology change is not just a link 
change, but change in the sequence of nodes.
This naming is meant to be within a routing domain and from a starting node, so 
it's actually maintenance of a default path tree.

> Tony
> 
> 
> 

Regards
Toni
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to