try again Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "t.petch" <[email protected]> To: "RRG" <[email protected]>; "Robin Whittle" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 9:42 AM Subject: Re: [rrg] Pumping IRON
> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tony Li" <[email protected]> > To: "Templin, Fred L" <[email protected]>; "RRG" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 1:16 AM > > > > Note that it is the responsibility of the shepherd to get the document to > > the state where the RG gives consensus that it should be published. This > > applies to all of the documents that we have started, not just Fred's. > > > > I'm concerned as I've seen no action from shepherds or membership on any of > > the proposal-specific documents. > > Robin > > I would urge you to progress some of your ideas towards RFC, especially the one > on CEE-CES split that you have explored on this list several times. > > I think that that idea is an important contribution to routing architectures and > may well be significant when most of what we have discussed here has been > forgotten. One caveat; I think that any such RFC would need to make sense to > those who have never heard of hIPv4, NOL, RANGI, NMS, TIDR, EEMDP etc. We who > have followed this list have a knowledge that noone else will ever acquire and > so any I-D that depends on that knowledge will generally be unintelligible. > Rather, I would like to see CEE-CES presented in the more commonplace concepts > of address, headers, tunnels etc, perhaps with reference to the specific > instantiations discussed here as appendices, as opposed to starting off by > saying 'these are CES, those are CEE', which will lose most of the audience:-( > > The other idea of yours that I think will be of long term benefit is real time > mapping. It does set your ideas apart from the others, and if and when the > others find they need it too, then having a well-documented scheme will prove a > valuable starting point. > > Tom Petch > > Regards, > > Tony > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rrg mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg > _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
