On Monday 07 June 2010 at 20:43:10 Noel Chiappa sent: > > From: Toni Stoev <[email protected]> > > > But having named nodes as hops, the topology change is not just a link > > change, but change in th e sequence of nodes. > > You seem to be describing source routes (either loose or strict, I can't tell > which).
I am describing a locator. It is formed as strict route. I present it for use as such. > > This naming is meant to be within a routing domain and from a starting > > node, so it's actually maintenance of a default path tree. > > And this is a source route using names which have only local (not global) > scope. That has been tried before, too. It is a locator formed as strict route from a certain node within a domain. This node is common for all locators within the domain. Actually the domain is formed based on locators span. The next-hop selection is comparison of destination and current nodes' locators for longest match. > Noel Toni _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
