Hi,

This conversation doesn't seem to be making significant forward progress.
Can we please take it offline until it generates a bit more enlightenment?

Endless reiteration is not persuasive in the least.

Thanks,
Tony



On 6/8/10 3:08 PM, "Toni Stoev" <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is intra-domain location naming that follows topology explicitly.

The
> location is of nodes. Locations are named with locators.
A locator is not just
> identifier of a node, but a representation of its place within a routing
> domain.
The locator represents the default sequence of hops from a starting
> node to the located node.
Hops are named with neighbor IDs. Each ID is of a
> node among the neighbors of the node with the preceding ID.
Obviously, being
> defined as representations of variable sequences of nodes, locators may differ
> in length.
All locators within a domain start from a common node ­ root. Thus
> the domain is defined as a spanning tree.

This location naming is made with
> "source routes" as locators, but those are just names of the locations of
> nodes.
No packet is obligated to go through the entire "source route" that its
> destination locator represents.

Hop-by-hop path selection within the
> destination routing domain:

When a packet enters a node of the tree, its
> destination locator is matched to the locator of the node.
The two locators by
> definition start with the same sequence. If there is any remaining difference,
> forwarding decision is made: Either forwarding upstream in the tree, or
> forwarding to one of the downstream branches.
This is the default behavior.
> Traffic engineering is still possible.

Again, this is destination
> intra-domain hop-by-hop path selection.
This path selection is not "source
> routing", but performs matching of "source routes" for making forwarding
> decisions.
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing
> list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg



_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to