> From: Paul Jakma <[email protected]>
>> 1) The topology-dependent name of a node's interface.
>> 2) The topology-dependent name of ... a group of related
>> subnetworks that share a single aggregate.
> FWIW, to me the clarification of 1 and 2 are unneeded. Topological
> naming implies the ability to aggregate
Perhaps, but the two classes have different semantics (i.e. it's possible to
visualize a class of names which can _only_ name interfaces), so it seemed
wise to make it explicit that both types of semantics are covered (at least,
as currently used).
Noel
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
