On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Noel Chiappa wrote:
Perhaps, but the two classes have different semantics (i.e. it's possible to visualize a class of names which can _only_ name interfaces),
Hmm, do you mean that it only names an interface without reference to location (e.g. "bge0")? Then it isn't a topological name anymore. Otherwise, I don't know what you mean with a class of names that only names interfaces while still being topologically dependent. ;)
regards, -- Paul Jakma [email protected] Key ID: 64A2FF6A Fortune: leverage, n.: Even if someone doesn't care what the world thinks about them, they always hope their mother doesn't find out. _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
