Hi, > 1. Why, in the first place, did people allow sites to inject PI > addresses in DFZ? Why not simply reject PI in DFZ, limiting their use > strictly inside a site?
Because that doesn't solve the multi-homed site problem. > 2. As to sites that migrated across ISPs, why not simply throw away > old PA addresses injected into a new ISP that is not responsible for > service to such foreign addresses? This is what normally happens. > 3. Is there any slightest chance that the authority (ICANN? IETF?) > resume to mandate such strict rules as above to bring back the > situation where it ought to have been? Not without a credible solution to the multi-homed site problem. Tony _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
