Hi Toni,
>> There is no name for the location of a node in ILNP. There is no need >> for one as long as there is some subnetwork point of attachment >> resolution (i.e., ND, ARP) based on the L3 locator and identifier. > > > Tony, are you quite sure about the lack of need for a name of the > location of a node? What happens when a node with a locally > unique identifier in a subnetwork moves to another subnetwork > where there is another node with exactly the same (locally > unique) identifier? How are the two nodes distinguished, and how > are their ongoing sessions preserved? Yes, I'm quite sure. Locally unique identifiers are there precisely for the set of people who have privacy concerns about globally unique identifiers. You are correct, locally unique identifiers will have mobility issues and hosts should not use their locally unique identifier outside if its scope. Tony _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
