On Tuesday 15 June 2010 at 03:45:33 Ran Atkinson sent: > > Dae-Young, > > You clearly haven't bothered to try to read the supplied > ILNP documentation (I-Ds & papers). Please go read them > before posting more questions/criticisms, as it is a waste > of many people's time (including both your time and mine, > but also the broader RG membership) to post questions or > criticisms when you haven't bothered to read the supplied > documentation first.
ILNP obviously has unresloved issues. Read in unclear statements. Those might get resolved here within discussions. And thus resolutions might get supporters here again. So why not just answer questions, instead of making people read additional non-routing related documentation. > Also, you seem a bit confused about EUI-64s, so you > might want to go read up on them also. IEEE has some > documentation, and other sources also have some online > documentation on EUI-64s. For the record, an EUI-64 is > *syntax*. Even a local-scope Identifier is an EUI-64, > as the documentation on EUI-64s will make clear when you > go read it. > > Cheers, > > Ran _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
