On Saturday 19 June 2010 at 01:38:44 Noel Chiappa sent: > > From: Toni Stoev <[email protected]> > > > You don't have a name for the location of a node, crisply in ILNP. > > You mean 'You don't have a name for A location of a node'. > > (A node may have more than one location at a time (for a multi-homed node). > > Noel
I meant quoting ILNP Concept of Operations. So may a subnetwork also have more than one location at a time? That is, what shall be the choice in the last paragraph on page 3 of ILNP Concept of Operations? The crux of this proposal is to have different names for the identity of a node and [ a | the ] location of a subnetwork, with crisp semantics for each. _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
