Hi Ran, thanks fro the feedback
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:16 PM, RJ Atkinson <[email protected]> wrote: > My only current request is editorial. Both in the Abstract > and also early in the Introduction of your document, please > make clear that your work is not related to the (perhaps better > known) Host Identity Protocol (HIP) work. This is purely > to make the difference between the ideas/proposal very crisp > and clear, since they share extremely similar acronyms ("hip" > in both cases). > I definitely agree with you - my "hip" abbreviation has plagued me and the draft for a long time, wish I could turn back the clock and get rid of it.... I have been thinking of replacing the current abbreviation with IPv44 - but does it make the situation any better? Comments and thoughts are welcome, thanks! Yours, Patrick _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
