Hi Xiaohu, I wanted to mention this in a separate thread so it can be found easily in the archives. In "Re: [rrg] Consensus check on ILNP" you wrote a correction to what I wrote about RANGI needing changes to IPv6 applications:
> In fact, RANGI doesn't require any change to applications. > We have just finished the implementions and experiments of RANGI. > > I will provide the URL for RANGI source codes soon. OK. Does this mean that any existing IPv6 application can work, including with a mixture of hosts which do and don't have RANGI stacks, including when the host which originates the communication does or doesn't have RANGI and starts with either an IP address (such as from a referral) or from a lookup of a FQDN? Can the applications still work OK when the FQDN lookup returns multiple IPv6 addresses, such as in a round-robin arrangement to spread the load over multiple hosts? I see the main I-D: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-rangi-04 was updated in August, from the February version 03 on which I based my questions / critique on (2010-02-20): http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg/current/msg06075.html and that the proxy I-D is unchanged since then: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-rangi-proxy-01 The slides, which are also currently cited in the RRG Report: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-14#ref-RANGI are no longer at the URL specified: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/09nov/slides/RRG-1.ppt http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/76/slides/RRG-1.ppt Is there any new documentation for RANGI? - Robin _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
