My slides sent to you separately as a pdf file. For the FIB aggregation work, you may wish to look up work by Lixia Zhang, Zartash Uzmi, Paul Francis at previous IETF GROW WG meetings.
A couple of recent links (there is much more work reported, of course): http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/76/slides/grow-5.pdf http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/78/slides/grow-2/grow-2.htm Sriram > -----Original Message----- > From: Heath Jones [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 11:08 AM > To: Sriram, Kotikalapudi > Cc: RRG > Subject: Re: [rrg] Odd BGP AS Path > > > Please see slides 3 and 4 at this link; the general stats related to > > AS_SETs may be of interest. > > http://www.antd.nist.gov/~ksriram/AS_SET_Aggregator_Stats.pdf > > Thankyou very much for the link (it's not working at the moment from > here, but i'll give it another try later). > > I'm actually looking into aggregation of prefixes within a tcam and > using this data to find out which AS's would be most heavily impacted > if they implemented such aggregation. > > There are many papers around about this and a fairly heavy argument > towards any aggregation creating non-determinism with regards to > required tcam size. (how can you know how much space you will need > free, given you cannot predict the removal of some aggregated > prefixes). I have not seen a paper that uses real world data as yet > though.. > > Any thoughts you might have are appreciated! _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
